To view this content, you must be a member of Ben's Patreon at $10 or more
Already a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to access this content.
To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to
To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to
To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to
To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to
Subscribe to be a patron and get additional posts by Ben, along with live-streams, and monthly patron meetings!
Also each month, you will get a special coupon code to save 20% on any product once a month.
7 thoughts on “Nathan Black – The Big Picture”
I like this idea – and anything with pictures or visuals. Either I draw a great deal or better yet I have the students draw the beginning to a story or problem. This gets their “voice” in there and rewards those who like to draw instead of those who offer clever answers out loud. I agree that the visuals keep them focused and actually reign in the vocabulary rather than expand it. But the visuals have to be chosen correctly for it to work well in asking. I gave them instructions from an ESL book that uses pictographs (the book is called Chalk Talks and I think I wrote about it before) to show emotions. I will do that again next year.
I appreciate all the end of year wisdom and honesty being shared here on this site. I would like to hear from people regarding input-based classes and the use of the word “rigor” in schools. I hate this word. It seems that to many rigor just means volumes and volumes of vocabulary or terminology with little meaning.
Any thoughts?
Thank you.
The Department of State is your friend on this one. Here is a quote I really like:
Teachers must also ensure that the program is intellectually rigorous, or academically challenging for each student at his or her individual level. Academic rigor does not imply harshness or severity. In a recent interview, Alfie Kohn (in O?Neill & Tell, 1999) states, “A lot of horrible practices are justified in the name of ‘rigor’ or challenge.’ People talk about ‘rigorous’ but often what they mean is ‘onerous,’ with schools turned into fact factories. This doesn’t help kids become critical, creative thinkers or lifelong learners (p. 20).”
The website goes on to give characteristics of academic rigor:
-depth and integrity of inquiry
-sustained focus
-suspension of premature conclusions
-continuous testing of hypotheses
For the full discussion of relevance and academic rigor, go here:
http://www.state.gov/m/a/os/44875.htm
Thank you. I will check this link out.
I am just weary of hearing rigor equated with meaningless volumes of information or the number of students who don’t pass a given class. More students pass my Spanish class than other classes in the 9th grade so at times teachers seem to pass judgment on the level of “rigor” in Spanish…
I am just weary of hearing rigor equated with meaningless volumes of information or the number of students who don’t pass a given class.
I agree wholeheartedly with your statement. However, outside agencies see a high D/F rate as a failure by the school to teach properly. The last time the accrediting committee came to my school we received only a three-year accreditation (and some on the committee wanted to give us no accreditation at all). Part of the reason for that was our high D/F rate. They told us we had to find a way to make our students, freshmen in particular, successful in high school. In some classes the failure rate is nearly 50%. That doesn’t show rigor; it shows absolutely abominable teaching. If a couple of students out of the 150+ that I teach fail, I can feel justified in concluding that the issue lies with them. If half of my students fail, the problem lies with me not them.
I’m a little distracted. That last post should have started out:
I agree wholeheartedly with your statement. Many teachers equate volume of work with rigor and complain loudly about how lazy students are these days. They justify their high failure by blaming their students. However, outside agencies . . .
[Without the intervening sentences the “however” is pretty senseless.]
We did something fun today – I wanted to get the kids into the writing frame of mind (tomorrow is the writing part of the district CRT) but not be stressful at all.
I have a huge folder of crazy pictures on my desktop. I picked 8 of them, totally unrelated, and showed them one at a time. The kids worked together in groups of 2-3 to write a story linking them. They could say whatever they wanted, I told them I wouldn’t grade them for spelling or anything other than having written a story, and that they needed to come up with something that flowed along with the pictures.
Each picture was weirder than the one preceding. The first was a guy on an airplane wearing a big orange sweater/stocking that covered his entire head and went down over a laptop computer. You couldn’t see the computer, his head or hands. I got some great ideas – of course, some wrote the obvious (he was looking at dirty pictures on his laptop) but others were funny – he was the ugliest man in the world and had to cover himself so the other people wouldn’t be hurt; he was a spy on a super top secret mission; he had a big zit.
The final picture was a woman sitting inside a vehicle while a troop of monkeys destroyed all of her luggage and climbed around the vehicle – maybe 25 monkeys or so? I wrote on the image that the woman was me and gave the names of students to the monkeys. They got a kick out of that, I told them it was just like being in class – one sane person surrounded by a bunch of crazy monkeys! (they probably thought it was the other way around, since I’m probably the weirdest one of the bunch)
Anyway, they had fun writing without it feeling like work. They were creative, and while I got very short stories from some groups (8 sentences, one for each image) from others I got much more – 1 1/2 to 2 pages!
So tomorrow when they have to do the 75 word minimum essay on what they are going to do over the summer, it will feel like a walk in the park. What’s 75 words about something so simple when you’ve done 2 pages of something complex and creative?
The pictures just helped them so much with creativity. I’m definitely going to do this again, it was inspirational for them. I’m planning to use pictures more in my stories as well.
http://www.brainrules.net/vision within seconds of exposure, pictures beat sentence and words for recall. And in memory tests where people are show hundreds of photos, they can remember 90% three days later — and 63% after a year.