FB Discussion on the Invisibles – 5

Ben Slavic in response to Terry Waltz:

I know your work has had a great effect on many people. I am very happy to be working side by side with you and so many other fine people to bring change to our field. Just for the record, I am the inventor of the One Word Images (and about twenty other strategies) that have “been around for a long time”. I have gone to conferences and sat in the back of the room and heard people present sessions on ideas that I have shared online for more than fifteen years now, but often without crediting their source. The Classroom Rules charts used in so many classrooms did not just materialize out of thin air. I have to say with respect that I have worked far too hard at this work, and been met with so much opposition simply for expressing my ideas, to be publicly dismissed by your callous and critical words. Are differences in how we all approach this work to be tolerated? Or is there just one way? Bless your heart, but the feeling that you project in your comment here, as well as your clear lack of interest in properly crediting sources and actually reading or educating yourself about new ideas in the comprehensible input world before publicly commenting on them, is most unwelcome. Of course we both know that there can be no new ideas in this work. Dr. Krashen and others have laid it out and there it is. However, the Invisibles represent a particular and new combination of three elements: (1) working from images drawn by the kids instead of from words from a list (this is very, very powerful and the engine of the Invisibles), (2) a particular combination of eleven student jobs of my own invention that have in fact not been around for a long time, and (3) a particularly new combination of asking questions during a story. Together, the three elements combine to create a genuinely new and far easier way of asking stories without all the stress. Yes, it is a new representation of comprehensible input. It has resulted in some amazing things. As Tina said, it gets kids much more involved. I have been looking for this breakthrough in my own teaching for so long. It is finally here for me and is working for others as well. Why would you dismiss that? Why would you want to put down Kathrin Shechtman’s words? How does that help her? Kathrin learned about the Invisibles in Agen and has now tested them through the fall and she is happy and wanted to share her happiness.

Related: K’NAAN – Wavin’ Flag (Coca-Cola Celebration Mix)

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn
[searchandfilter fields="search," types="daterange,daterange,daterange" headings="Search"]
Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe to Our Mailing List

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.

Related Posts

The Problem with CI

Jeffrey Sachs was asked what the difference between people in Norway and in the U.S. was. He responded that people in Norway are happy and

CI and the Research (cont.)

Admins don’t actually read the research. They don’t have time. If or when they do read it, they do not really grasp it. How could

Research Question

I got a question: “Hi Ben, I am preparing some documents that support CI teaching to show my administrators. I looked through the blog and

We Have the Research

A teacher contacted me awhile back. She had been attacked about using CI from a team leader. I told her to get some research from

$10

~PER MONTH

Subscribe to be a patron and get additional posts by Ben, along with live-streams, and monthly patron meetings!

Also each month, you will get a special coupon code to save 20% on any product once a month.

  • 20% coupon to anything in the store once a month
  • Access to monthly meetings with Ben
  • Access to exclusive Patreon posts by Ben
  • Access to livestreams by Ben