I often felt, at the big summer workshops, that I couldn’t possibly remember all the stuff they were teaching me. It really was overwhelming. But now I realize it wasn’t me. They were giving me too many rules and things I had to follow, like circling and targeting. I’m glad it worked for them, but […]
Many CI teachers don’t/can’t apply what Krashen has shown to be true that language acquisition is an unconscious process. The teaching gene in them is too dominant. They think they have to teach. But they don’t. All they have to do is communicate, which is far different than teaching. Here is my point again: …many
It’s not good the way we collect papers from students. I don’t even collect free writes. They go in composition books kept in the room. If I have time, I look at them. What teacher has time? I only read some of the free writes. I guess that makes me a bad teacher. They need
Hello, I am a first year teacher at the high school level and I love the ideas you present in your book A Natural Approach to the Year. I am wondering if you have developed anything or have any suggestions on where to look for examples of how this is used in upper level courses.
Some in the group may want to check this new version of the old jGR and current Interpersonal Skills Rubric. In keeping with our way of working together here as a group, we never assume that there is only one way to do something. Ron Wilbur explains what he did and why in creating a
Here is a 2009 article by John Bordeaux about personalized learning. The last few paragraphs are particularly powerful: Let’s imagine a conversation at the close of the 19th century. You and a team of designers are considering elements of the internal combustion engine that will, if successful, trigger a revolution in personal transportation and change
Personalized Learning Is A Central Design Principle In Education Read More »
I wrote a book – PQA in a Wink! – that addresses classroom management in TPRS. That was back in 2008, ten years ago. I was reading the conclusion to that book recently and thought I would share it here, since it reflects the same core attitude toward this work that can be found in
This is an updated repost from February of 2008: My teacher gave me a fender. She told me it was “important” to really look at the fender, which she called relative pronouns. Then she gave me two bumpers, front and back. Verbs, she called them, regular and irregular. Important. Then she gave me a steering
I was going back and reading Greg’s comments from over the summer here and this one I thought was worth sharing here today: I think NTCI is superior for two reasons 1) targeting is a constraint on student interest 2) targeting can lead to a denial of i+1. That being said, for COMPLETE beginners (first
Dear Ben, Thank you for creating this group and for what you do. I am writing to let you know that I just joined the group today. I attended your workshop in Tucson last year and since then I have been implementing and studying your books. I am also part of the CI Liftoff facebook
I don’t remember posting things that are unrelated to the general discussion here, but here goes – I can’t help it: https://www.yahoo.com/news/bad-lip-reading-reveals-sarah-074641860.html
This is a post that I put on FB in early 2016, a few months before the appearance in the next year of the two “natural approach” books. I post it here because, as I look back on it now, I see that it is a kind of manifesto on the subject of non-targeted comprehensible
