Report from the Field – John Piazza

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben's Patreon at $10 or more
Already a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to access this content.



21 thoughts on “Report from the Field – John Piazza”

  1. This is great news, John. It represents a huge shift for administrators – and I hope this is not just one administrator’s opinion.
    There is so much inequity that we don’t see, so we need to combat inequity that we do see and have some voice. On the news today there was an item about where the “good schools” are located. Across the country, and particularly in California and New York, the majority of “good schools” are in zip codes that are unaffordable for middle-income families. As a result, inequality in education is systemic. I’m not certain how the researchers defined “good schools”, so that is why I put the term in quotes. I will let people draw their own conclusions.

  2. I spoke with Bracey today, and I think his situation is improving as well, now that his admin is on the way out. This goes to show how crucial a supportive admin is for doing this kind of work. Without that backing, we might as well look for employment elsewhere. Bob Patrick has worked hard the past decade to help his admins to support him, including giving them talking points for when they are confronted by parents, teachers, or admins from other districts. Admins hate to be taken by surprise, and need our support so that they can support us–and we are the experts. I am lucky that mine has decades of real language work under her belt, but this is the exception.

    1. Hi John,
      What you’re in the middle of as a Latin teacher at Berkeley High School may very well lead to a greater awareness of the SLA work done by people such as Bonnie Norton, Carolyn McKinney, Patricia Duff, Steven Talmy, people who would look at the details of pedagogical classroom techniques as unseparated from socialization and social identity.
      What is happening in your school very much looks like what has happened recently at Mizzou, Yale, and Claremont McKenna College (and probably other colleges I am not aware of), and I am not-so-secretly hoping that our college campuses can begin to talk about the learning atmosphere of our language classrooms as a part of this larger debate.
      I am so sorry that I was confused about who you are and where you teach! I most certainly remember meeting in Denver at the iFLT and how impressed I was with the work you do at your school.

  3. That is great news! So happy to hear it!
    Portland Public Schools, my district, also has a very important, front-and-center racial equity initiative and I just know that one day the worlds of CI and equity will collide. (Especially if I keep bringing it up…ha ha!)
    Teaching grammar-based lessons, units, years…it is inequitable and it will go by the wayside. It’s not just inequitable racially, but that is a big part of it. I also teach Spanish at night school and the night school students are predominately kids of color. Many of my Spanish students (of all backgrounds) have told me that they failed Spanish the first time around because they just could not motivate themselves enough to give a patootie about some grammar worksheets and word find activities, and memorizing dialogues. Making the kids the focus of class is not a cure-all, because these kids have been damaged in their self-esteem as language learners, or acquirers. But it does help them to see an entry point to Spanish. I just wish that all their teaching could have been higher-quality and maybe they would not need to recover these credits.
    This is fantastic news and I am so pleased to hear it! What a great outcome and I am so glad you have this administrator on your side.

  4. I work in a “rich white district” but equity issues have impacted us as well. Kids with IEPs, behavior issues, speech/language or social worker needs – almost all find themselves happy and successful in our classes in ways they never did in the past.

  5. …making the kids the focus of class is not a cure-all, because these kids have been damaged in their self-esteem as language learners, or acquirers. But it does help them to see an entry point to Spanish….
    …many of my Spanish students (of all backgrounds) have told me that they failed Spanish the first time around….
    Thank you for these sentences, Tina. They are good and true things that rarely if ever get addressed in the mix of it all. We really work for kids in this group. Fred Rogers said this:
    …when I was very young, most of my childhood heroes wore capes, flew through the air, or picked up buildings with one arm. They were spectacular and got a lot of attention. But as I grew, my heroes changed, so that now I can honestly say that anyone who does anything to help a child is a hero to me….

  6. I was so glad to hear this news from John. This admin truly gets the greater purpose of what John is doing. Latin in particular has a long and sinister history of being only for society’s upper crust. This attitude gets perpetuated in today’s traditional Latin classrooms. Impossibly complex grammar assessments serve as virtual “poll tests” to ensure that Latin classes remain exclusive. Of course these are also features of traditional modern language classes.
    Here are some of the arguments that resisters will use to argue on behalf of having inequitable classroom:
    1) You shouldn’t have to lower the standards and expectations of your classes to reach more types of learners. You should be able to help all kinds of learners achieve the same rigorous expectations.
    2) Making your classes easier just perpetuates the belief that poor and minority students are less capable than their affluent white counterparts.
    3) You are setting up these same students for failure down the road. You are building false confidence in your students that will soon be dashed when they get a more rigorous Latin teacher.

    1. I know I’m preaching to the choir here, but I can’t resist responding.
      All three of the arguments from the “resisters” are based on a false assumption. That false assumption is that what you are doing is less rigors, that you have lowered your standards and expectations.
      A response to those arguments must begin at the presuppositional level, i.e. with the false assumption, not with manifestations of “rigor”. Ask these resisters to define rigor. My guess is that they will not have a cogent or coherent definition and any definition they com up with will sound a lot like “onerous” rather than “rigorous”. I keep going back to the Department of State’s definition:
      1. Sustained focus
      2. Depth and integrity of inquiry
      3. Constant testing of hypotheses
      4. Suspension of premature conclusions
      I can show (and have shown) that TPRS/TCI is far more rigorous than a grammar syllabus.
      Furthermore, you have not lowered the standards, you simply teach to different standards. Different is not necessarily either inferior or superior; it is primarily different. Standards are good or bad as they relate to the goal. If the goal is to use the language, then standards that deal with conjugations and declensions are inferior; if the goal is linguistic knowledge, they are still inferior because they do not adequately address what linguistics are about.
      If by “more rigorous Latin teacher” they mean someone who teaches like them, this is a rhetorical tautology and therefor an invalid argument. That’s one reason why the definition of rigor must be established and maintained, not allowing the word “rigor” to be ambiguous or susceptible to multiple definitions. In the long run, if a student progresses to the point of being able to read Latin (or any other language) with at least some degree of facility, then the nature of further study should be left up to the student. If I want to spend my evening reading Wheelock or the Germania, the choice is mine. (There are times when I would choose Wheelock and times when I would choose Vergil.) Gesenius (Hebrew Grammar) or “B’Reshith”? My choice. Nahmad (Arabic Grammar) or Kalila wa Dimna? My choice. The “more rigorous Latin teacher” might actually represent a roadblock on the path to dealing effectively with the authentic texts.
      All of this is without getting into any discussion of the 13-15 years of advantage enjoyed by the “affluent (white) counterparts”.
      Okay, rant over.

      1. When I read John’s comment, I thought, “Robert Harrell has the best response to this,” and then look – there Robert wrote it out.
        The complaints are indeed presupposing a lot about what rigor is and what standards are valid for language classes.

      2. And the choir says, “Amen.”
        Thanks for the good news John P.
        John B., How would they figure that speaking Latin to their students is less rigorous than speaking English to them? If speaking Latin in a comprehensible way is so easy, why doesn’t every Latin teacher start that way?

  7. Congrats John on the great news! I always want to see an admin defend his or her mandates to faculty, as in “I want you to do this because X and Y and if you don’t plan to do so then I expect you to be ready to defend that position extremely well” and not back down after a couple challenges. I hope that your admin will keep at it! We know you will.

  8. Thanks everybody for the support and encouragement. Also, this post has turned into a very productive discussion around how to respond to the critics with their tired old arguments. Ultimately, CI will win out because it is a best practice, and because it is equitable teaching. Public school is not UBER, it is the bus. We don’t leave anyone behind. And if privileged parents want to pay for “rigor”, they can go and do that with a private institution, and/or hire a tutor. Traditional programs require the stragglers to hire tutors. How about the 1%ers hire a grammar tutor? Their parents can more likely afford it, and it is cheaper than the almost 30+k/year tuition of some fancy high schools where I live.

Leave a Comment

  • Search

Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe to Our Mailing List

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.

Related Posts

Stendra Super Force generico all’ingrosso

Stendra Super Force generico all’ingrosso Valutazione 4.6 sulla base di 352 voti. Nome del prodotto: Stendra Super Force Categoria: Disfunzione Erettile Nome commerciale: Extra Super

The Problem with CI

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to

CI and the Research (cont.)

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to



Subscribe to be a patron and get additional posts by Ben, along with live-streams, and monthly patron meetings!

Also each month, you will get a special coupon code to save 20% on any product once a month.

  • 20% coupon to anything in the store once a month
  • Access to monthly meetings with Ben
  • Access to exclusive Patreon posts by Ben
  • Access to livestreams by Ben