Throw The Dog A Bone 1

We have a store in Denver called R.E.I. which sells all kinds of camping stuff, mountaineering equipment, etc. I was near the section that sells hiking shoes when a lady came in and asked the salesperson for a pair of high heels.
The salesperson said they didn’t have any. The customer pitched a fit. The weird part about it was that there were some high heels way in the back of the storeroom that the salesperson knew about, because the store had once been a shoe store, a long time before, in decades past. So the store actually had some high heels back in the back. Unbelievably, the salesperson was able to find a pair of shoes that the customer liked.
What can we take from this weird ass little story? What does this admittedly fabricated image tell us about our choice of instructional methods in our classrooms?
I know what I take from it. If an administrator or parent or, God forbid, my fellow teaching colleagues think that people wear high heels into the mountains (i.e. teach grammar translation) and I have a pair of high heels to give them from the old days of how I used to teach, I’ll do that. I’ll give them the high heels.
For five minutes a day. In little pieces. As a break from the hard work of CI. Knowing that it will accomplish virtually nothing in terms of language acquisition, but that it will keep my colleagues from pitching a fit.
Moreover, I will always limit such instruction to how basic sentences are constructed in the target language. That’s it. This includes what an infinitive is, how it gets conjugated, how sentences are formed in the affirmative, negative, etc., in various tenses, and how prepositions interact with articles after the main sentence structure.
So my grammar instruction is limited to making sure that my first year students know by the end of the year how to translate a simple sentence like “She gives the book to John” or “We danced to the store”.
What about object pronouns? Nope. They get taught during pop-ups during the CI. Basic sentence structure only. How to conjugate a verb out of its infinitive form. Not possessive pronouns, adjectives, any of that. A few hours per year of basic subject verb stuff. The first 12 pages of the Amsco book. No more.
It’s almost like a grammar brain break from the hard work of doing auditory CI. CI purists who get it see such instruction as unnecessary, but I disagree because I work in a school and I know that schools are places where research doesn’t necessarily apply.
To me, after much thought, if it placates the lady who wants the high heels, then it’s worth it. We throw the bone to the dog. But for only for five minutes a day. In little pieces. As a break from the hard work of CI. Maybe three hours of instruction total over the course of the year. Just enough to get people to shut up.



Leave a Comment

  • Search

Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe to Our Mailing List

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.

Related Posts

The Problem with CI

Jeffrey Sachs was asked what the difference between people in Norway and in the U.S. was. He responded that people in Norway are happy and

CI and the Research (cont.)

Admins don’t actually read the research. They don’t have time. If or when they do read it, they do not really grasp it. How could

Research Question

I got a question: “Hi Ben, I am preparing some documents that support CI teaching to show my administrators. I looked through the blog and

We Have the Research

A teacher contacted me awhile back. She had been attacked about using CI from a team leader. I told her to get some research from



Subscribe to be a patron and get additional posts by Ben, along with live-streams, and monthly patron meetings!

Also each month, you will get a special coupon code to save 20% on any product once a month.

  • 20% coupon to anything in the store once a month
  • Access to monthly meetings with Ben
  • Access to exclusive Patreon posts by Ben
  • Access to livestreams by Ben