College Professors of Latin, Wake Up!

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben's Patreon at $10 or more
Already a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to access this content.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

6 thoughts on “College Professors of Latin, Wake Up!”

  1. Unfortunately, AP/College Board is often the tail that wags the dog. In my own school they did away with fourth-year Spanish and require all students who want to go beyond third year to take AP. How absurd is that?
    Take a look at the comparison chart I did of the various “rating” schemes of language acquisition (CEFR, ACTFL, ILR) – http://www.digitalcomprehensible.com/Digital_Comprehensible/Acquisition_Levels.html – and you will see that the College Board places the minimum level for AP above what is expected of students in a four-year program. As a result, if all students have to take AP for their fourth year, one or more of the following will happen:
    1. Students who love the language but are not “academic” will drop out of the language sequence
    2. Teachers will not teach a true AP course, and so
    a. Students will take the course but not sit the exam
    b. Students will take the exam and wonder why they didn’t do well when they got good grades in the AP class
    3. Students will be miserable
    4. Teachers will be miserable
    5. College Board will make money
    Quite frankly, I fit into category 2a. I have never taught to the AP test because I do not think it is relevant to the lives of most of my students. As a result, I have perhaps 1 or 2 students per year take the exam. Up until two years ago, they all passed. (Two years ago I would have told the two students who signed up not to take the exam, but they didn’t ask.) Last year no one sat the exam. This year I have three students who ought to take the exam, but we’ll have to see. I have 12 students enrolled in the AP class, so they will get the weighted grade. I’m fine with that.
    BTW, AP Language is different from all the other AP courses. Yes, all of them are to be taught as a college-level course. But AP Chemistry, Math, Biology, etc. are all “entry-level” courses. That is, the AP course equivalent might be offered in the freshman year of college. In World Language, the requirement is to teach the equivalent of a third year college course. It’s should a wonder to no one that only students who either are native speakers or have been in a K-12 program will be ready for AP – certainly not high school the average high school student who has had three years of a language.
    Yes, we need to teach our students to advocate for themselves. At some point there has to be a “critical mass” of demand for something else; maybe if some of the university professors realize how jeopardized their entire departments – not just their individual positions- are, there will begin to be change.
    Okay, enough for now. Time to get to bed.

  2. Thanks, Robert, for your illuminating analysis of how out of touch the College Board is when it comes to the realities of language learning.
    By the way, the Luke I mentioned is Luke Henderson, an incredibly talented and energetic Latin teacher at Santa Monica High School, whose students produce professional quality dramatic and musical productions entirely in Latin. Seeing is believing:
    http://samohilatin.blogspot.com/2008/09/blog-post.html

  3. To John Piazza and/or any other classically educated teachers on this list:
    I love your comments and I checked out your book on Marcus Aurelius. I enjoy reading the Stoics, particularly Epictetus, but Marcus Aurelius is also a favorite of mine–seems close to Plato’s ideal ruler to me.
    I am working on a story/unit using a subjunctive form in Spanish that uses the phrase “para que…” ( In order that…). I was wondering if you were aware of any quotes similar to this one:
    “Todo lo que hacemos está puesto con el ojo en otra cosa”
    —Aristóteles, filósofo griego antiguo (384-322 a.C.)
    “All that we do is done with an eye toward something else.” —Aristotle
    The idea being that we are trying to figure out WHY this kid is doing what he is doing. He is doing ____ in order that he might _______, and he is doing ____ in order that he might ______, in infinite regression until we arrive at he is doing ____ in order that he might be happy.
    I am not sure if this is too much cognitively for my Spanish 3 students to deal with, but I want to give it a try. any thoughts here?

Leave a Comment

  • Search

Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe to Our Mailing List

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.

Related Posts

The Problem with CI

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to

CI and the Research (cont.)

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to

Research Question

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to

We Have the Research

To view this content, you must be a member of Ben’s Patreon at $10 or more Unlock with PatreonAlready a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to

$10

~PER MONTH

Subscribe to be a patron and get additional posts by Ben, along with live-streams, and monthly patron meetings!

Also each month, you will get a special coupon code to save 20% on any product once a month.

  • 20% coupon to anything in the store once a month
  • Access to monthly meetings with Ben
  • Access to exclusive Patreon posts by Ben
  • Access to livestreams by Ben